"
"Risarcite il Comune con 25 milioni"
La richiesta della Procura della Corte dei conti contro Banca Intesa per un "buco" nella riscossione delle imposte: il calcolo sugli anni dal '91 al '94. Ma a Palazzo d'Accursio prevale lo scetticismo
di ELEONORA CAPELLI
Maxi-compensation of 25 million to Banca Intesa the banks of the Municipality of Bologna, at the very moment of the most painful budget cuts. For now, only the request of the Prosecutor of the Court of Auditors: will be analyzed by the courts in February for a "hole" in the collection of taxes in the years from 1991 to '94. The process there opened yesterday in the Court of Auditors and the bank (inside the merged savings bank, which was originally the owner of the collection in the province of Bologna) is called to account by Paul Novelli pm after a 'trial lasted five years.
The investigation Banca Intesa also objected to a "chasm" of 370 million euro to the national treasuries, and this trend Banca Intesa has chosen to take advantage of an amnesty, paying 10.91% of the total, ie 40 million. But the "amnesty" does not cancel the assessment on the taxes due at the Palazzo d'Accursio.
The news of the claim arrives in town as one of the few good news in times of cutbacks. "The sub Commissioner Matthew Piantedosi fainted when he heard - he jokes Commissioner Anna Maria Cancellieri - It would be just what it takes, indeed, already 2 million would be a bell'aiuto. "more" pessimistic "M. Cammarata, Head of the revenue." For the moment this does not affect the budget - he said - though it is clear that if there was a conviction , the sum calculated by the Prosecutor of the Court of Auditors exceeds even the size of the cuts envisaged, so it would be a real breath of fresh air. I do not much account, because there is a single reading of the amnesty application. By the way, even if the damage was suffered by the city, in this case the money goes to the State. "
Prosecutors of the Prosecutor is based on the argument that the '91 to '94, the dealer has decided only to collect the taxes from those who paid them regularly, and if you had to resort to foreclosure was not received anything, because the ' operation was too costly. According to the indictment, there was a real system of preparation of the minutes at the table, so that taxpayers did not pay taxes were always untraceable or have-nots. In this way, the request was justified to the City to pay the costs of collection "forced", that in fact the second indictment was never made. The Guardia di Finanza has trawled nearly 80 000 tax assessments and in the end the bill submitted to the bank is very high. Now the ball is in the courts.
Just a note: The collector had an advantage only if it was receiving!
The fact is that we were in for a few but certainly not a business strategy
desired by the individual: but there are none so deaf as those who do not want to hear!
0 comments:
Post a Comment